“An exposé of planetary scale.”
~JAMES E. HANSEN  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



research database

Ken Haapala

 Credentials

  • MS (Economics), Economic Modeling, Energy Economics. [1]

 Background 

Ken Haapala is the Executive Vice President of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP). Haapala has contributed to the the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) reports.

Haapala regularly contributes to "The Week That Was," a weekly SEPP update on climate news, with a “News You Can Use” section that highlights articles and papers written by climate skeptics. 

Stance on Climate Change 

Happala is an endorser of the Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change which declares, among other points, that: [2]

"there is no convincing evidence that CO2 emissions from modern industrial activity has in the past, is now, or will in the future cause catastrophic climate change."

Key Quotes 

"Carbon dioxide is a necessary food for green plants, thus necessary for life on this planet as we generally recognize it. As discussed in the second report, thousands of experiments and observations show that virtually all food crops and green plants thrive better in an atmosphere enriched in carbon dioxide and better resist stress such as draught, or insect attacks. Contrary to EPA claims, Carbon dioxide enrichment, condemned by these regulations, is a benefit to agriculture, humanity, and the planet." [3]

"The EPA has failed to present any compelling physical evidence that man’s emissions of Greenhouse Gases caused the 20th Century warming. Instead, it has relied on the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its faulty computer models that are biased, obsolete, and wrong." [3]

Key Deeds 

June 2011 

Speaker at the Heartland Institute's Sixth International Conference on Climate Change. 

March 2008

Attended at the Heartland Institute's 2008 International Conference on Climate Change and subsequently signed the Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change. [1]

 Affiliations 

 Publications

  • Haapala contributed to the "Petition For Reconsideration of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change" (PDF) in February, 2010. The collective reports are the result of a cooperation between the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) and the Competetive Enterprise Institute.      
  • Haapala's "The Week That Was" series is regularly republished on the WUWT blog. 
  • "Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate" (PDF). Contributor.  

 Resources

  1. "Endorsers of the Declaration Present at the Conference in New York City." ICSC.

  2. "Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change," International Climate Science Coalition.

  3. "Ken's EPA Testimony," Northern Virginia Chapter of SEEE, November 18, 2009.

  4. ExxonSecrets Factsheet: SEPP.

  5. ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Ken Haapala.

DeSmogBlog thoroughly investigates the academic and industry backgrounds of those involved in the PR spin campaigns that are confusing the public and stalling action on global warming. If there's anyone or any organization, ( i.e. scientist, self-professed "expert," think tank, industry association, company) that you would like to see researched and reported on DeSmogBlog, please contact us here and we will try our best.

If you need something more quickly, please let us know and we can arrange to have the process expedited for a small fee to cover research costs.

Check out our database of Individuals involved in the global warming denial industry.

or

FOLLOW US!
 
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER
Get our Top 5 stories in your inbox weekly.
DESMOG TIP JAR
Help us clear the PR pollution that clouds climate science.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.


www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.